Review and Edit Research Papers on Water, Sanitation, and Social Development
Review and edit research manuscripts on water, sanitation, and social development.
Overview
Review and edit research manuscripts on water, sanitation, and social development.
You have:
- PhD (or equivalent experience) in environmental science, public health, communication studies, or related fields.
- Demonstrated experience editing or reviewing academic publications.
- Familiarity with water quality research, WASH assessments, social impact analysis, or cultural studies.
- Ability to perform independently and meet deadlines.
Contract
This is a UNV contract. More about UNV contracts.
Papua New Guinea is facing escalating development challenges—ranging from limited access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation to communication disruptions that affect governance and cultural cohesion. To address these issues, the Morobe Development Foundation (MDF) has prepared five research manuscripts on topics including water quality, hygiene practices, healthcare access, community waste management, and the impact of digital communication on traditional social structures.
These research papers are being prepared for submission to academic journals and aim to inform sustainable, community-based solutions to critical development concerns. However, to ensure their clarity, quality, and academic rigour, MDF seeks the assistance of Online Volunteers with relevant academic and editorial experience.
By supporting the review and refinement of these papers, Online Volunteers will directly contribute to research and advocacy that supports Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation. Your contribution will help amplify community voices, strengthen scientific validity, and influence national and local development strategies.
MDF is engaging eight Online Volunteers with relevant subject matter and editorial expertise to review and edit five research manuscripts. Each volunteer will be assigned one key focus area aligned with their background.
Online Volunteer Roles and Focus Areas:
Volunteer 1: Review and improve analysis on water scarcity and its environmental determinants, ensuring scientific clarity and logical flow. Volunteer 2: Edit sections related to waterborne disease risks and public health impacts, providing medical/scientific insight and coherence. Volunteer 3: Review content on community sanitation and hygiene practices, especially gender-sensitive health concerns. Volunteer 4: Edit and structure content on solid waste management in institutional or urban settings, focusing on technical feasibility. Volunteer 5: Refine analysis on the influence of communication technologies on cultural and democratic norms, ensuring consistency in socio-political language. Volunteer 6: Support the review of a health service accessibility study, focusing on clarity, terminology, and structure. Volunteer 7: Provide editorial feedback on a technical water feasibility report, ensuring alignment with engineering and environmental standards. Volunteer 8: Conduct a cross-cutting review of policy relevance and community development recommendations across all papers, ensuring practicality and scholarly tone.
Online Volunteers will be acknowledged in the publication or considered as co-authors, depending on their level of contribution. The selected volunteer will also receive a Certificate of Appreciation issued through the Unified Volunteer Platform.
The selected candidate should have: - PhD (or equivalent experience) in environmental science, public health, communication studies, or related fields. - Demonstrated experience editing or reviewing academic publications. - Familiarity with water quality research, WASH assessments, social impact analysis, or cultural studies. - Ability to perform independently and meet deadlines.
Potential interview questions
| Can you describe your experience with editing academic publications? | This question assesses your relevant experience and familiarity with academic standards. | Share specific examples of papers or journal articles you've edited and the outcomes. |
| What strategies do you use to ensure clarity and coherence in research writing? | The interviewer wants to know your editing process and attention to detail. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you approach subject matter that is unfamiliar to you during the editing process? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| Can you give an example of a challenging edit you had to make? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you prioritize your workload when facing multiple deadlines? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What do you think are the key elements of effective scientific communication? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you ensure that the ethical considerations are addressed in research publications? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What role do you believe digital communication plays in modern research dissemination? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |