Review and Edit Research Papers on Water, Sanitation, and Social Development
Assist in reviewing and editing manuscripts on water and sanitation challenges.
Overview
Assist in reviewing and editing manuscripts on water and sanitation challenges.
You have:
- PhD (or equivalent experience) in environmental science, public health, communication studies, or related fields.
- Demonstrated experience editing or reviewing academic publications.
- Familiarity with water quality research, WaSH assessments, social impact analysis, or cultural studies.
- Ability to perform independently and meet deadlines.
Contract
This is a UNV contract. More about UNV contracts.
Papua New Guinea is facing escalating development challenges—ranging from limited access to safe drinking water and proper sanitation to communication disruptions that affect governance and cultural cohesion. To address these issues, the Morobe Development Foundation (MDF) has prepared five research manuscripts on topics including water quality, hygiene practices, healthcare access, community waste management, and the impact of digital communication on traditional social structures.
These research papers are being prepared for submission to academic journals and aim to inform sustainable, community-based solutions to critical development concerns. However, to ensure their clarity, quality, and academic rigour, MDF seeks the assistance of Online Volunteers with relevant academic and editorial experience.
By supporting the review and refinement of these papers, Online Volunteers will directly contribute to research and advocacy that supports Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation. Your contribution will help amplify community voices, strengthen scientific validity, and influence national and local development strategies.
MDF is engaging eight Online Volunteers with relevant subject matter and editorial expertise to review and edit five research manuscripts. Each volunteer will be assigned one key focus area aligned with their background.
Online Volunteer Roles and Focus Areas: Volunteer 1: Review and improve analysis on water scarcity and its environmental determinants, ensuring scientific clarity and logical flow. Volunteer 2: Edit sections related to waterborne disease risks and public health impacts, providing medical/scientific insight and coherence. Volunteer 3: Review content on community sanitation and hygiene practices, especially gender-sensitive health concerns. Volunteer 4: Edit and structure content on solid waste management in institutional or urban settings, focusing on technical feasibility. Volunteer 5: Refine analysis on the influence of communication technologies on cultural and democratic norms, ensuring consistency in socio-political language. Volunteer 6: Support the review of a health service accessibility study, focusing on clarity, terminology, and structure. Volunteer 7: Provide editorial feedback on a technical water feasibility report, ensuring alignment with engineering and environmental standards. Volunteer 8: Conduct a cross-cutting review of policy relevance and community development recommendations across all papers, ensuring practicality and scholarly tone.
Online Volunteers will be acknowledged in the publication or considered as co-authors, depending on their level of contribution. The selected volunteer will also receive a Certificate of Appreciation issued through the Unified Volunteer Platform.
The selected candidate should have: - PhD (or equivalent experience) in environmental science, public health, communication studies, or related fields. - Demonstrated experience editing or reviewing academic publications. - Familiarity with water quality research, WaSH assessments, social impact analysis, or cultural studies. - Ability to perform independently and meet deadlines.
Potential interview questions
| Can you describe your experience with editing academic papers? | This question assesses the candidate's editorial background relevant to the role. | Provide detailed examples of your involvement in editorial processes, particularly with academic publications. |
| What is your familiarity with water quality issues? | The interviewer wants to know your level of knowledge in relevant topics. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you ensure scientific clarity in your reviews? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| Describe a time when you had to meet strict deadlines for an editing task. | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What strategies do you use to provide constructive feedback? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| Can you discuss any experience you have with WaSH assessments? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you handle conflicting viewpoints in research papers? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What role do you think community feedback plays in research development? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |