External Evaluator - Final Evaluation of Humanitarian Project

Conduct final evaluation for humanitarian project.

This opening is not available anymore. Do not try to apply for this job.

People in Need

Open positions at People in Need

Home-based; Yerevan (Armenia)

Open application form

Overview

Conduct final evaluation for humanitarian project.

You have:

At least 5 years of professional experience in working in a humanitarian context and conducting humanitarian project evaluations.
Proven experience and knowledge of conducting quantitative and qualitative research.
Excellent analytical skills.
Significant practical experience in report writing and formulation of recommendations.
Excellent spoken and written English.
Experience evaluating ECHO-funded projects.
Previous experience with results-based monitoring and evaluation methodologies.
Russian language will be considered an advantage.

Uncertain job market? Build your professional network now.

Colleagues.org

Details

Description

People in Need (PIN) Armenia is seeking an experienced External Evaluator (individual or team) to conduct the final evaluation of a humanitarian project funded by DG ECHO and implemented in partnership with Médecins du Monde and Mission Armenia.

The project supported over 40,000 conflict-affected individuals with services in mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS), protection, shelter/winterization, and multi-purpose cash assistance.

Key Responsibilities

Design and carry out a performance-based evaluation
Assess the relevance, coherence, and effectiveness of the project
Evaluate alignment with national priorities and emergency response needs
Analyze collaboration between consortium partners and other actors
Identify lessons learned and make practical recommendations
Submit a final evaluation report (max. 20 pages), including tools and respondent list in annex

Deliverables

The final report (in English) should include:

Executive Summary (max 2 pages)
Introduction & Methodology (max 3 pages)
Findings & Discussion (max 10 pages)
Lessons Learned & Recommendations (max 6 pages)
Annexes: tools, list of respondents with roles, locations, contacts

Read the full Terms of Reference (ToR) here: https://armenia.peopleinneed.net/media/publications/2589/file/tor_echo_final-evaluation_eng.pdf

Benefits

How to Apply

Interested candidates (individuals or teams) should submit the following documents by June 25, 2025, 18:00 to [email protected] .

CV(s) of the evaluator(s)
Short technical proposal outlining the evaluation approach and timeline
Financial proposal (budget)
At least one example of a previous evaluation report

Requirements

Essential:

At least 5 years of professional experience in working in a humanitarian context and conducting humanitarian project evaluations;
Proven experience and knowledge of conducting quantitative and qualitative research;
Excellent analytical skills;
Significant practical experience in report writing and formulation of recommendations;
Excellent spoken and written English.

Preferred:

Experience evaluating ECHO-funded projects;
Previous experience with results‐based monitoring and evaluation methodologies;
Russian language will be considered an advantage.

Apply now

Potential interview questions

Can you describe a time when you conducted an evaluation of a humanitarian project?	This assesses your practical experience in humanitarian evaluations.	Provide a clear, concise example focusing on your role and the impact of the evaluation.
How do you ensure the reliability and validity of your research findings?	This question explores your methodology and critical thinking skills.	Pro members can see the explanation.
Describe a challenge you faced during a past evaluation. How did you resolve it?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.
What approaches do you use to engage stakeholders during evaluations?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.
How do you incorporate lessons learned into your evaluation reports?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.
How do you prioritize different evaluation criteria during your assessments?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.
What is your experience with results-based monitoring methodologies?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.
Can you provide an example of how you've used quantitative and qualitative data in an evaluation?	Pro members can see the explanation.	Pro members can see the explanation.