Call for Application Evaluators CISTRAT
Evaluate the International Centre for Engineering Education (CISTRAT) under UNESCO.
Overview
Evaluate the International Centre for Engineering Education (CISTRAT) under UNESCO.
You have:
- Be eligible to undertake paid work in the People’s Republic of China or be legally registered as an enterprise or organization or an individual with suitable experience.
- Main personnel responsible for the evaluation should have advanced degree in science, engineering or education-related subjects, social sciences, management and economics, and other relevant fields.
- At least ten years of working experience in leading evaluations (for the lead evaluator, if it is an organization) acquired for an international organization.
- Understanding and knowledge of the Engineering research and education status in China.
- Understanding and knowledge of the UN system.
- Knowledge of and experience in applying qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques and RBM principles.
- Excellent analytical and demonstrated drafting skills in English and Chinese (writing work samples to be submitted).
- No previous involvement in the implementation of the activities under review.
Contract
This is a Consultancy contract. More about Consultancy contracts.
**OVERVIEW** ------------ Parent Sector : \[\[Natural Science\]\] Duty Station: \[\[BEIJING\]\] \[\[BEIJING\]\] Duration of contract : \[\[2 months\]\] Recruitment open to : \[\[Individual consultant/ consulting company\]\] Application Deadline (Midnight Paris Time) : 25 November 2025 UNESCO Core Values: Commitment to the Organization, Integrity, Respect for Diversity, Professionalism **OVERVIEW OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE POST** ----------------------------------------- **Evaluation of the International Centre for Engineering Education (CISTRAT) under the auspices of UNESCO** Long Description ---------------- **Refer to the [attached document for details](https://unesco.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/BeijingTeam/IQAeqwDaFvBIRbj3uIb-hX9EAbvuldA4Z26rboRRqp8_dzI?e=SlEsSz).** Long Description ---------------- Long Description ---------------- **COMPETENCIES (Core / Managerial)** ------------------------------------ Accountability (C) Communication (C) Innovation (C) Knowledge sharing and continuous improvement (C) Planning and organizing (C) Results focus (C) Teamwork (C) Professionalism (C) **-** ----- For detailed information, please consult the [UNESCO Competency Framework](https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/competency_framework_e.pdf). **REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS** --------------------------- • Be eligible to undertake paid work in the People’s Republic of China or be legally registered as an enterprise or organization or an individual with suitable experience; • Main personnel responsible for the evaluation should have advanced degree in science, engineering or education-related subjects, social sciences, management and economics, and other relevant fields; • At least ten years of working experience in leading evaluations i(for the lead evaluator, if it is an organization) acquired for an international organization; • Understanding and knowledge of the Engineering research and education status in China; • Understanding and knowledge of the UN system; • Knowledge of and experience in applying qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques and RBM principles; • Excellent analytical and demonstrated drafting skills in English and Chinese (writing work samples to be submitted); • No previous involvement in the implementation of the activities under review. **DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS** ---------------------------- - 5 years of work experience in the UN or experience with assignments for the UN; - Experience with assignments focusing on multi-stakeholder partnerships, and/or science education and engineering education - Provide when possible samples of reports in both English and Chinese. **BENEFITS AND ENTITLEMENTS** ----------------------------- **SELECTION AND RECRUITMENT PROCESS** ------------------------------------- Please note that all candidates must complete an on-line application and provide complete and accurate information. To apply, please visit the [UNESCO careers website.](https://careers.unesco.org/careersection/2/joblist.ftl) No modifications can be made to the application submitted. The evaluation of candidates is based on the criteria in the vacancy notice, and may include tests and/or assessments, as well as a competency-based interview. UNESCO uses communication technologies such as video or teleconference, e-mail correspondence, etc. for the assessment and evaluation of candidates. Please note that only selected candidates will be further contacted and candidates in the final selection step will be subject to reference checks based on the information provided. **Footer** ---------- UNESCO recalls that paramount consideration in the appointment of staff members shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, technical competence and integrity. UNESCO applies a zero-tolerance policy against all forms of harassment. UNESCO is committed to achieving and sustaining equitable and diverse geographical distribution, as well as gender parity among its staff members in all categories and at all grades. Furthermore, UNESCO is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Candidates from non- and under-represented Member States ([last update here](https://www.unesco.org/en/geo-distribution)) are particularly welcome and strongly encouraged to apply. Individuals from minority groups and indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the highest level of confidentiality. Worldwide mobility is required for staff members appointed to international posts. UNESCO does not charge a fee at any stage of the recruitment process. Please note that UNESCO is a non-smoking Organization.
Potential interview questions
| Can you describe a complex evaluation project you led and the outcomes achieved? | The interviewer is assessing your experience and effectiveness in leading evaluations. | Provide a clear overview of the project, your role, and the impact of the evaluation. |
| How do you approach qualitative and quantitative data analysis? | The interviewer wants to understand your analytical skills and methodologies used. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What are the critical considerations in evaluating engineering education in different cultural contexts? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| Describe your experience with multi-stakeholder partnerships in evaluation contexts. | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you ensure objectivity and integrity in your evaluations? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| Can you provide an example of how your recommendations from an evaluation were implemented? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| What challenges have you faced in past evaluations and how did you overcome them? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |
| How do you stay updated with trends in engineering research and education? | Pro members can see the explanation. | Pro members can see the explanation. |